Judge's Name | Rahul Agarwal |
---|---|
Competitor Business Name | Gamble Tech Firm |
1. CONTENT (Business Nature and Industry) | (ADEQUATE) - Shows an adequate understanding |
Score for CONTENT | 3 |
2. PREPAREDNESS (Research and work put in) | (ADEQUATE) - Fairly prepared but with some missing parts |
Score for PREPAREDNESS | 3 |
3. PITCH SKILLS (Persuasion and time delivery) | (GOOD) - Shows enthusiasm and creativity. Could be more clear and concise |
Score for PITCH SKILLS | 4 |
4. COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND POTENTIAL for GROWTH (SWOT analysis) | (ADEQUATE) - Shows understanding of their business and competitors |
Score for COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND POTENTIAL for GROWTH (SWOT analysis) | 3 |
5. OVERALL CONCEPT (Business concept, creativity, innovation and vision) | (GOOD) - Describes most details about overall concept and vision and concept is original and innovative |
Score for OVERALL CONCEPT | 4 |
6. COMMUNITY & TARGET MARKET (Market size and social impact) | (GOOD) - Product or service is described and includes some details about the consumer audience |
Score for COMMUNITY & TARGET MARKET | 4 |
Total Score | 21 |
NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS | presentation was enthusiastic and solid overall, could have better prepared on explaining how to recruit mentors and how to reach significant increase in projected revenue |